Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGFX vs RMFCX
HDGFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGFX vs RMFCX
HDGFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGFX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGFX (18.5B). HDGFX (1.21) and RMFCX (1.16) have matching dividends . HDGFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGFX (9 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than HDGFX (0.63). HDGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGFX: RMFCX (250) vs HDGFX (1000000). HDGFX (9.67) and RMFCX (9.26) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.48 vs. HDGFX (26.92).
| HDGFX | RMFCX | HDGFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.944 | 8.881 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.5B | 118B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.16 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.67 | 9.26 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.07 | 34.52 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.92 | 37.48 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.61 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers