Ad is loading...
HDGIX vs RMFCX
HDGIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGIX vs RMFCX
Hartford Dividend and Growth I
Price$32.78
Change+$0.09 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.12B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.63B
HDGIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGIX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. HDGIX (17.1B). HDGIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HDGIX (1.69) vs RMFCX (1.37). HDGIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGIX (19 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than HDGIX (0.73). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HDGIX (28.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGIX: RMFCX (250) vs HDGIX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. HDGIX (-4.55). RMFCX (56.16) and HDGIX (55.24) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HDGIX | RMFCX | HDGIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.91 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.91 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.549 | 1.270 | -43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.1B | 101B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 1.37 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.55 | 5.35 | -85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.99 | 17.29 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.24 | 56.16 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.30 | 60.33 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...