Ad is loading...
HDGIX vs RMFCX
HDGIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGIX vs RMFCX
Hartford Dividend and Growth I
Price$31.34
Change-$0.11 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.67B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.60
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
HDGIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. HDGIX (16.7B). HDGIX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HDGIX (1.65) vs RMFCX (1.34). HDGIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGIX (19 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than HDGIX (0.73). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HDGIX (28.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGIX: RMFCX (250) vs HDGIX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.60 vs. HDGIX (-4.01). HDGIX (51.10) and RMFCX (48.78) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HDGIX | RMFCX | HDGIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.91 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.91 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.322 | -3.342 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.7B | 96.5B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 1.34 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.01 | 3.60 | -111% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.36 | 5.79 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.10 | 48.78 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.67 | 52.90 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...