Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGIX vs RMFCX
HDGIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGIX vs RMFCX
HDGIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGIX (18.8B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HDGIX: RMFCX (1.15) vs HDGIX (1.08). HDGIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGIX (20 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than HDGIX (0.74). HDGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGIX: RMFCX (250) vs HDGIX (2000). HDGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.95 vs. RMFCX (9.09). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. HDGIX (27.82).
| HDGIX | RMFCX | HDGIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.91 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.91 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.314 | 9.496 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.8B | 118B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.15 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.95 | 9.09 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.74 | 33.16 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.82 | 37.08 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.19 | 92.36 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers