Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGIX vs RMFCX
HDGIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGIX vs RMFCX
HDGIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGIX (19B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HDGIX: RMFCX (1.15) vs HDGIX (1.08). HDGIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGIX (20 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than HDGIX (0.74). HDGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGIX: RMFCX (250) vs HDGIX (2000). HDGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.19 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. HDGIX (27.99).
| HDGIX | RMFCX | HDGIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.91 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.91 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.315 | 10.454 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19B | 118B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.15 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.19 | 9.14 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.59 | 38.82 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.99 | 36.70 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.61 | 92.27 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers