Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGIX vs RMFCX
HDGIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGIX vs RMFCX
HDGIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGIX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HDGIX (18.4B). RMFCX (1.19) and HDGIX (1.17) have matching dividends . HDGIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGIX (20 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than HDGIX (0.74). HDGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDGIX: RMFCX (250) vs HDGIX (2000). HDGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. RMFCX (10.30). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.58 vs. HDGIX (26.06).
| HDGIX | RMFCX | HDGIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.91 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.91 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.580 | 6.522 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.4B | 117B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.19 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.27 | 10.30 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.72 | 35.10 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.06 | 36.58 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.91 | 96.37 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement