Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGRX vs RMEBX
HDGRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HDGRX vs RMEBX
HDGRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HDGRX (18.6B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than HDGRX: RMEBX (1.00) vs HDGRX (0.56). HDGRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HDGRX (20 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). HDGRX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). HDGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). HDGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: HDGRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX (9.42) and HDGRX (9.38) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.07 vs. HDGRX (23.37).
| HDGRX | RMEBX | HDGRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.07 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.07 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.807 | 9.178 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.6B | 117B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.00 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.38 | 9.42 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.22 | 35.26 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.37 | 36.07 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.48 | 93.48 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers