Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGRX vs RMEBX
HDGRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HDGRX vs RMEBX
HDGRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HDGRX (18.8B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than HDGRX: RMEBX (0.99) vs HDGRX (0.53). HDGRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HDGRX (20 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). HDGRX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). HDGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). HDGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: HDGRX (0) vs RMEBX (250). HDGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.56 vs. RMEBX (6.28). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.49 vs. HDGRX (25.13).
| HDGRX | RMEBX | HDGRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.07 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.07 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.500 | 8.295 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.8B | 117B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.99 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.56 | 6.28 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.38 | 34.96 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.13 | 34.49 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.89 | 91.75 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers