Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGRX vs RMFCX
HDGRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGRX vs RMFCX
HDGRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGRX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HDGRX (18.5B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HDGRX: RMFCX (1.19) vs HDGRX (0.62). HDGRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGRX (19 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HDGRX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HDGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). HDGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HDGRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). HDGRX (9.56) and RMFCX (9.31) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.71 vs. HDGRX (21.43).
| HDGRX | RMFCX | HDGRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.91 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.91 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.557 | 6.953 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.5B | 117B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.19 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.56 | 9.31 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.85 | 34.52 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.43 | 34.71 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.32 | 94.50 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers