Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGRX vs RMFCX
HDGRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGRX vs RMFCX
HDGRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGRX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HDGRX (18.8B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HDGRX: RMFCX (1.15) vs HDGRX (0.53). HDGRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGRX (20 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HDGRX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HDGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). HDGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HDGRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). HDGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.56 vs. RMFCX (6.41). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.44 vs. HDGRX (25.13).
| HDGRX | RMFCX | HDGRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.91 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.91 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.500 | 8.402 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.8B | 117B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.15 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.56 | 6.41 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.38 | 35.52 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.13 | 35.44 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.89 | 93.54 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers