Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGSX vs RMEBX
HDGSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HDGSX vs RMEBX
HDGSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGSX (19.1B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than HDGSX: RMEBX (0.99) vs HDGSX (0.78). HDGSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HDGSX (20 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) and HDGSX (1.04) have similar cost to investors . HDGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). HDGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: HDGSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). HDGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.97 vs. RMEBX (8.38). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.23 vs. HDGSX (26.38).
| HDGSX | RMEBX | HDGSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.07 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.07 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.795 | 10.434 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.1B | 118B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.99 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.97 | 8.38 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.82 | 37.82 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.38 | 35.23 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.72 | 92.37 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement