Ad is loading...
HDGSX vs RMFCX
HDGSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGSX vs RMFCX
Hartford Dividend and Growth R4
Price$34.06
Change+$0.08 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.12B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.11
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.63B
HDGSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGSX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. HDGSX (17.1B). RMFCX (1.37) and HDGSX (1.33) have matching dividends . HDGSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGSX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HDGSX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HDGSX (28.00). HDGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HDGSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.26 vs. HDGSX (-4.56). RMFCX (55.85) and HDGSX (54.00) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HDGSX | RMFCX | HDGSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.870 | 1.068 | -81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.1B | 101B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.37 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.56 | 5.26 | -87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.61 | 14.57 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.00 | 55.85 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.58 | 59.33 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers