Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGSX vs RMFCX
HDGSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGSX vs RMFCX
Hartford Dividend and Growth R4
Price$37.09
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.89B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
HDGSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. HDGSX (17.9B). RMFCX (1.24) and HDGSX (1.23) have matching dividends . HDGSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGSX (19 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HDGSX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HDGSX (28.00). HDGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HDGSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. HDGSX (0.26). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.41 vs. HDGSX (50.48).
| HDGSX | RMFCX | HDGSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.746 | 11.421 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.9B | 109B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.24 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.26 | 7.71 | 3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.97 | 32.16 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.48 | 56.41 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.82 | 91.12 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement