Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGSX vs RMFCX
HDGSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGSX vs RMFCX
HDGSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HDGSX (18.4B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HDGSX: RMFCX (1.19) vs HDGSX (0.86). HDGSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGSX (20 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HDGSX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). HDGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). HDGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HDGSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.60 vs. HDGSX (9.11). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.72 vs. HDGSX (24.24).
| HDGSX | RMFCX | HDGSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.91 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.91 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.625 | 7.804 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.4B | 117B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 1.19 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.11 | 9.60 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.04 | 35.52 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.24 | 36.72 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.18 | 98.68 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers