Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGTX vs RMFCX
HDGTX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGTX vs RMFCX
HDGTX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGTX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGTX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGTX (19B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than HDGTX: RMFCX (1.15) vs HDGTX (1.04). HDGTX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGTX (20 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than HDGTX (0.73). HDGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). HDGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HDGTX (0) vs RMFCX (250). HDGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.74 vs. RMFCX (9.14). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. HDGTX (29.48).
| HDGTX | RMFCX | HDGTX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.91 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.91 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.322 | 10.454 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19B | 118B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.15 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.74 | 9.14 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.73 | 38.82 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.48 | 36.70 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.61 | 92.27 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers