Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGVX vs RMFCX
HDGVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGVX vs RMFCX
HDGVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. HDGVX (18.6B). HDGVX (1.20) and RMFCX (1.19) have matching dividends . HDGVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGVX (12 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than HDGVX (0.63). HDGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). HDGVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HDGVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). HDGVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.37 vs. RMFCX (10.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.04 vs. HDGVX (26.72).
| HDGVX | RMFCX | HDGVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.804 | 6.510 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.6B | 115B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.19 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.37 | 10.31 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.20 | 35.49 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.72 | 34.04 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.46 | 92.67 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers