Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGVX vs RMFCX
HDGVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGVX vs RMFCX
HDGVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HDGVX (18.6B). RMFCX (1.16) and HDGVX (1.15) have matching dividends . HDGVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGVX (12 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than HDGVX (0.63). HDGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). HDGVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HDGVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). HDGVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.39 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. HDGVX (28.43).
| HDGVX | RMFCX | HDGVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.902 | 9.137 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.6B | 118B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.16 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.39 | 8.88 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.12 | 34.84 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.43 | 37.23 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.04 | 91.06 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement