Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HDGVX vs RMFCX
HDGVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HDGVX vs RMFCX
HDGVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HDGVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HDGVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HDGVX (18.6B). RMFCX (1.15) and HDGVX (1.10) have matching dividends . HDGVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HDGVX (12 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than HDGVX (0.63). HDGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). HDGVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: HDGVX (0) vs RMFCX (250). HDGVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.64 vs. RMFCX (3.69). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.60 vs. HDGVX (29.13).
| HDGVX | RMFCX | HDGVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.91 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.646 | 7.417 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.6B | 117B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.15 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.64 | 3.69 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.53 | 33.94 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.13 | 34.60 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.23 | 91.73 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement