Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HEQFX vs VIMSX
HEQFX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HEQFX vs VIMSX
Monteagle Opportunity Equity I
Price$4.87
Change-$0.05 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.26M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$77.08
Change-$0.49 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets192.45B
HEQFX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HEQFX vs. VIMSX commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HEQFX is a Buy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 192B vs. HEQFX (15.3M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HEQFX: VIMSX (1.40) vs HEQFX (0.21). HEQFX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HEQFX (27 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). HEQFX (1.78) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). HEQFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). HEQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: HEQFX (2000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.37 vs. HEQFX (5.82). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 72.27 vs. HEQFX (0.71).
| HEQFX | VIMSX | HEQFX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.17 | 1,047% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.17 | 1,047% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.692 | 7.694 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.3M | 192B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 1.40 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.82 | 15.37 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.91 | 43.81 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.71 | 72.27 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -47.34 | 123.79 | -38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement