Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HEQFX vs VIMSX
HEQFX vs VIMSX Comparison
Open Charts HEQFX vs VIMSX
Monteagle Opportunity Equity I
Price$5.15
Change+$0.02 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.96M
Vanguard Mid Cap Index Investor
Price$79.00
Change-$0.11 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.16B
HEQFX vs VIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HEQFX vs. VIMSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HEQFX is a Buy and VIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIMSX has more cash in the bank: 199B vs. HEQFX (16M). VIMSX pays higher dividends than HEQFX: VIMSX (1.35) vs HEQFX (0.20). HEQFX was incepted earlier than VIMSX: HEQFX (27 years) vs VIMSX (27 years). HEQFX (1.78) is less costly to investors than VIMSX (0.17). HEQFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. VIMSX (16.00). HEQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIMSX: HEQFX (2000) vs VIMSX (3000). VIMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.02 vs. HEQFX (7.76). VIMSX return over 5 years is better than : 64.92 vs. HEQFX (-3.52).
| HEQFX | VIMSX | HEQFX / VIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.17 | 1,047% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.17 | 1,047% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.586 | 9.679 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16M | 199B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 1.35 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.76 | 15.02 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.88 | 41.01 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.52 | 64.92 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.92 | 140.93 | -30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement