Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCGX vs NAESX
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HFCGX vs NAESX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor
Price$31.95
Change-$0.10 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets509.04M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$117.84
Change-$0.44 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCGX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCGX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. HFCGX (509M). NAESX pays higher dividends than HFCGX: NAESX (1.25) vs HFCGX (0.11). HFCGX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HFCGX (29 years) vs NAESX (65 years). HFCGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). HFCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). HFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: HFCGX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.15 vs. HFCGX (-7.60). HFCGX return over 5 years is better than : 61.28 vs. NAESX (57.53).
| HFCGX | NAESX | HFCGX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.17 | 759% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.17 | 759% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.691 | 2.494 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 509M | 154B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 1.25 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.60 | 9.15 | -83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.90 | 20.39 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.28 | 57.53 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.67 | 112.59 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement