Ad is loading...
HFCGX vs NAESX
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HFCGX vs NAESX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor
Price$31.16
Change-$1.17 (-3.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets578.43M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$114.78
Change-$3.10 (-2.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.88B
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCGX vs. NAESX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCGX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. HFCGX (578M). NAESX pays higher dividends than HFCGX: NAESX (1.31) vs HFCGX (0.30). HFCGX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HFCGX (28 years) vs NAESX (64 years). HFCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). HFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: HFCGX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.23 vs. HFCGX (9.10). HFCGX return over 5 years is better than : 59.52 vs. NAESX (48.20).
| HFCGX | NAESX | HFCGX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 64 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.079 | 2.371 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 578M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.31 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.10 | 14.23 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.92 | 21.97 | 218% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.52 | 48.20 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.15 | 110.71 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...