Ad is loading...
HFCGX vs NAESX
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HFCGX vs NAESX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor
Price$31.83
Change-$1.31 (-3.95%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$115.41
Change-$4.89 (-4.06%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCGX vs. NAESX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCGX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 167B vs. HFCGX (559M). NAESX pays higher dividends than HFCGX: NAESX (1.31) vs HFCGX (0.30). HFCGX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HFCGX (28 years) vs NAESX (64 years). HFCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). HFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: HFCGX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). HFCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.43 vs. NAESX (19.54). HFCGX return over 5 years is better than : 60.46 vs. NAESX (53.79).
| HFCGX | NAESX | HFCGX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 64 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.259 | 17.994 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 559M | 167B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.31 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.43 | 19.54 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 15.71 | 264% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.46 | 53.79 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.70 | 124.30 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...