Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCGX vs NAESX
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HFCGX vs NAESX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor
Price$31.38
Change-$0.38 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets514.46M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$110.00
Change-$1.80 (-1.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.56B
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCGX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCGX is a Buy and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. HFCGX (514M). NAESX pays higher dividends than HFCGX: NAESX (1.35) vs HFCGX (0.11). HFCGX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HFCGX (29 years) vs NAESX (65 years). HFCGX (1.29) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). HFCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). HFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: HFCGX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. HFCGX (-6.83). HFCGX return over 5 years is better than : 87.15 vs. NAESX (63.19).
| HFCGX | NAESX | HFCGX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.17 | 759% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.17 | 759% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.414 | -4.390 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 514M | 148B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 1.35 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.83 | 5.19 | -131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.52 | 31.28 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.15 | 63.19 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.66 | 92.88 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers