Ad is loading...
HFCGX vs NAESX
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HFCGX vs NAESX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor
Price$33.23
Change+$0.16 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets581.11M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$119.03
Change+$0.48 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.27B
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCGX vs. NAESX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCGX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. HFCGX (581M). NAESX pays higher dividends than HFCGX: NAESX (1.31) vs HFCGX (0.30). HFCGX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HFCGX (28 years) vs NAESX (64 years). HFCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). HFCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: HFCGX (2500) vs NAESX (3000). HFCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.56 vs. NAESX (21.23). HFCGX return over 5 years is better than : 57.08 vs. NAESX (48.81).
| HFCGX | NAESX | HFCGX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 64 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.398 | 3.370 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 581M | 155B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.31 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.56 | 21.23 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.07 | 17.16 | 257% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.08 | 48.81 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.35 | 126.44 | 61% |