Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCGX vs NAESX
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HFCGX vs NAESX
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCGX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCGX is a Buy and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. HFCGX (470M). NAESX pays higher dividends than HFCGX: NAESX (1.09) vs HFCGX (0.00). HFCGX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HFCGX (30 years) vs NAESX (66 years). HFCGX (1.32) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). HFCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFCGX: NAESX (0) vs HFCGX (2500). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.55 vs. HFCGX (16.37). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 35.79 vs. HFCGX (32.07).
| HFCGX | NAESX | HFCGX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.17 | 776% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.17 | 776% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.873 | 15.551 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 470M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.37 | 17.55 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.45 | 53.16 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.07 | 35.79 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.27 | 156.68 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement