Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCGX vs NAESX
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts HFCGX vs NAESX
HFCGX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCGX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCGX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. HFCGX (475M). NAESX pays higher dividends than HFCGX: NAESX (1.10) vs HFCGX (0.00). HFCGX was incepted earlier than NAESX: HFCGX (30 years) vs NAESX (66 years). HFCGX (1.32) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). HFCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFCGX: NAESX (0) vs HFCGX (2500). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.66 vs. HFCGX (16.68). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 42.60 vs. HFCGX (32.34).
| HFCGX | NAESX | HFCGX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.17 | 776% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.17 | 776% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.024 | 18.777 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 475M | 183B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.68 | 24.66 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.76 | 58.08 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.34 | 42.60 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.57 | 159.29 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers