Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCIX vs RRMGX
HFCIX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts HFCIX vs RRMGX
HFCIX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCIX vs. RRMGX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCIX is a Buy and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. HFCIX (467M). HFCIX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . HFCIX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: HFCIX (18 years) vs RRMGX (24 years). RRMGX (1.31) is less costly to investors than HFCIX (1.10). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. HFCIX (1.00). RRMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFCIX: RRMGX (2500) vs HFCIX (250000). RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.21 vs. HFCIX (-22.99). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : -23.10 vs. HFCIX (-50.40).
| HFCIX | RRMGX | HFCIX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.31 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.31 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.134 | 5.703 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 467M | 22.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.99 | 0.21 | -10,789% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.16 | 1.02 | -2,472% |
| Returns for 5 years | -50.40 | -23.10 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | -46.67 | 20.18 | -231% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement