Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCIX vs RRMGX
HFCIX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts HFCIX vs RRMGX
HFCIX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCIX vs. RRMGX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCIX is a Hold and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 20.8B vs. HFCIX (420M). HFCIX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . HFCIX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: HFCIX (18 years) vs RRMGX (24 years). RRMGX (1.31) is less costly to investors than HFCIX (1.10). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. HFCIX (1.00). RRMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFCIX: RRMGX (2500) vs HFCIX (250000). RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.91 vs. HFCIX (-28.83). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : -28.62 vs. HFCIX (-54.70).
| HFCIX | RRMGX | HFCIX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.31 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.31 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.120 | -0.284 | 2,155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 420M | 20.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -28.83 | -6.91 | 417% |
| Returns for 3 years | -31.87 | -4.09 | 780% |
| Returns for 5 years | -54.70 | -28.62 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | -49.70 | 16.36 | -304% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers