Ad is loading...
HFCSX vs RPMGX
HFCSX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts HFCSX vs RPMGX
Hennessy Focus Investor
Price$39.37
Change+$0.65 (+1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets446.57M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$89.19
Change+$1.29 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.38B
HFCSX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCSX vs. RPMGX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCSX is a StrongBuy and RPMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.4B vs. HFCSX (447M). HFCSX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . HFCSX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: HFCSX (28 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). HFCSX (1.50) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.76). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. HFCSX (10.00). HFCSX (2500) and RPMGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HFCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.68 vs. RPMGX (-14.45). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 7.88 vs. HFCSX (-35.30).
| HFCSX | RPMGX | HFCSX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.76 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.76 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.350 | -11.862 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 447M | 25.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.68 | -14.45 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | -35.82 | -9.68 | 370% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.30 | 7.88 | -448% |
| Returns for 10 years | -46.05 | 8.15 | -565% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...