Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCSX vs RPMGX
HFCSX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts HFCSX vs RPMGX
HFCSX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCSX vs. RPMGX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCSX is a Hold and RPMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 22.4B vs. HFCSX (510M). HFCSX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . HFCSX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: HFCSX (29 years) vs RPMGX (34 years). HFCSX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.77). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. HFCSX (1.00). HFCSX (2500) and RPMGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.42 vs. HFCSX (-17.18). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : -19.43 vs. HFCSX (-45.91).
| HFCSX | RPMGX | HFCSX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.77 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.77 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.820 | 1.748 | 447% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 510M | 22.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.18 | 0.42 | -4,130% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.68 | 2.03 | -1,018% |
| Returns for 5 years | -45.91 | -19.43 | 236% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.31 | 36.82 | -115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement