Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCSX vs RRMGX
HFCSX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts HFCSX vs RRMGX
HFCSX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCSX vs. RRMGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCSX is a Buy and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. HFCSX (467M). HFCSX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . HFCSX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: HFCSX (30 years) vs RRMGX (24 years). HFCSX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.31). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. HFCSX (1.00). HFCSX (2500) and RRMGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.21 vs. HFCSX (-23.25). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : -23.10 vs. HFCSX (-51.30).
| HFCSX | RRMGX | HFCSX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.31 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.31 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.928 | 5.703 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 467M | 22.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.25 | 0.21 | -10,908% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.99 | 1.02 | -2,554% |
| Returns for 5 years | -51.30 | -23.10 | 222% |
| Returns for 10 years | -48.53 | 20.18 | -241% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement