Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCSX vs RRMGX
HFCSX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts HFCSX vs RRMGX
HFCSX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCSX vs. RRMGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCSX is a Hold and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. HFCSX (427M). HFCSX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . HFCSX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: HFCSX (30 years) vs RRMGX (24 years). HFCSX (1.48) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.31). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. HFCSX (1.00). HFCSX (2500) and RRMGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.87 vs. HFCSX (-27.31). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : -29.10 vs. HFCSX (-55.18).
| HFCSX | RRMGX | HFCSX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.31 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.31 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.675 | -0.426 | 1,332% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 427M | 21.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -27.31 | -7.87 | 347% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.00 | -5.46 | 586% |
| Returns for 5 years | -55.18 | -29.10 | 190% |
| Returns for 10 years | -51.17 | 16.81 | -304% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement