Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCSX vs TRQZX
HFCSX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts HFCSX vs TRQZX
HFCSX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCSX vs. TRQZX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCSX is a Hold and TRQZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 22.4B vs. HFCSX (510M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than HFCSX: TRQZX (0.72) vs HFCSX (0.00). HFCSX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: HFCSX (29 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). HFCSX (1.48) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). TRQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.50 vs. HFCSX (1.00). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFCSX: TRQZX (0) vs HFCSX (2500). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.27 vs. HFCSX (-17.18). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -16.71 vs. HFCSX (-45.91).
| HFCSX | TRQZX | HFCSX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.61 | 243% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.820 | 2.116 | 370% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 510M | 22.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.72 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.18 | 1.27 | -1,352% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.68 | 4.61 | -449% |
| Returns for 5 years | -45.91 | -16.71 | 275% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement