Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCVX vs RMEBX
HFCVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HFCVX vs RMEBX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Investor
Price$22.75
Change-$0.08 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets295.59M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
HFCVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. HFCVX (296M). HFCVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HFCVX (2.87) vs RMEBX (1.09). HFCVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HFCVX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). HFCVX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HFCVX (22.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFCVX: RMEBX (250) vs HFCVX (2500). HFCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.77 vs. RMEBX (7.45). HFCVX return over 5 years is better than : 75.38 vs. RMEBX (55.11).
| HFCVX | RMEBX | HFCVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.07 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.07 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.852 | 11.179 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 296M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.87 | 1.09 | 264% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.77 | 7.45 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.91 | 31.44 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.38 | 55.11 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.90 | 89.18 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement