Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCVX vs RMEBX
HFCVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HFCVX vs RMEBX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Investor
Price$22.52
Change+$0.03 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.53M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.40
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
HFCVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. HFCVX (293M). HFCVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HFCVX (3.00) vs RMEBX (1.11). HFCVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HFCVX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). HFCVX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HFCVX (22.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFCVX: RMEBX (250) vs HFCVX (2500). HFCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.67 vs. RMEBX (7.63). HFCVX return over 5 years is better than : 70.67 vs. RMEBX (53.85).
| HFCVX | RMEBX | HFCVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.07 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.07 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.172 | 10.612 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 1.11 | 271% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.67 | 7.63 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.80 | 22.19 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.67 | 53.85 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.70 | 77.43 | 72% |