Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCVX vs RMEBX
HFCVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HFCVX vs RMEBX
HFCVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HFCVX (337M). HFCVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HFCVX (2.11) vs RMEBX (0.99). HFCVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HFCVX (30 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). HFCVX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. HFCVX (27.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFCVX: RMEBX (250) vs HFCVX (2500). HFCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.17 vs. RMEBX (8.96). HFCVX return over 5 years is better than : 54.11 vs. RMEBX (36.13).
| HFCVX | RMEBX | HFCVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.614 | 9.416 | 176% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 0.99 | 213% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.17 | 8.96 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.19 | 32.63 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.11 | 36.13 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.39 | 90.64 | 86% |