Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCVX vs RMEBX
HFCVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HFCVX vs RMEBX
HFCVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HFCVX (344M). HFCVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HFCVX (2.11) vs RMEBX (0.99). HFCVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HFCVX (30 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). HFCVX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. HFCVX (27.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFCVX: RMEBX (250) vs HFCVX (2500). HFCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.06 vs. RMEBX (9.03). HFCVX return over 5 years is better than : 57.57 vs. RMEBX (35.75).
| HFCVX | RMEBX | HFCVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.488 | 10.367 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 344M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 0.99 | 213% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.06 | 9.03 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.11 | 38.30 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.57 | 35.75 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.07 | 90.55 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement