Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCVX vs RMEBX
HFCVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts HFCVX vs RMEBX
HFCVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. HFCVX (326M). HFCVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: HFCVX (2.17) vs RMEBX (1.04). HFCVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: HFCVX (30 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). HFCVX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. HFCVX (27.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFCVX: RMEBX (250) vs HFCVX (2500). HFCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.84 vs. RMEBX (9.11). HFCVX return over 5 years is better than : 45.77 vs. RMEBX (34.74).
| HFCVX | RMEBX | HFCVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.181 | 6.308 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 326M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.17 | 1.04 | 209% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.84 | 9.11 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.55 | 34.37 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.77 | 34.74 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.93 | 94.33 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers