Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCVX vs RMFCX
HFCVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HFCVX vs RMFCX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Investor
Price$22.81
Change+$0.20 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets289.89M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
HFCVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. HFCVX (290M). HFCVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HFCVX (2.86) vs RMFCX (1.20). HFCVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HFCVX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). HFCVX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. HFCVX (22.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFCVX: RMFCX (250) vs HFCVX (2500). HFCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.14 vs. RMFCX (4.67). HFCVX return over 5 years is better than : 76.33 vs. RMFCX (56.66).
| HFCVX | RMFCX | HFCVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.91 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.91 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.765 | 13.375 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 290M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.86 | 1.20 | 238% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.14 | 4.67 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.88 | 38.41 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.33 | 56.66 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.52 | 90.65 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement