Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFCVX vs RMFCX
HFCVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts HFCVX vs RMFCX
HFCVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFCVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFCVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. HFCVX (337M). HFCVX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: HFCVX (2.11) vs RMFCX (1.15). HFCVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: HFCVX (30 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). HFCVX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. HFCVX (27.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFCVX: RMFCX (250) vs HFCVX (2500). HFCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.17 vs. RMFCX (9.09). HFCVX return over 5 years is better than : 54.11 vs. RMFCX (37.08).
| HFCVX | RMFCX | HFCVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.614 | 9.496 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 1.15 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.17 | 9.09 | 233% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.19 | 33.16 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.11 | 37.08 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.39 | 92.36 | 85% |