| HFGO | QQQM | HFGO / QQQM | |
| Gain YTD | 12.936 | 17.161 | 75% |
| Net Assets | 181M | 67.4B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.15 | 393% |
| Turnover | 68.00 | 8.00 | 850% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 5 years | - |
| HFGO | QQQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 87% | 17 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IVOO | 106.91 | 0.35 | +0.33% |
| Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | |||
| CSPF | 25.95 | 0.06 | +0.21% |
| Cohen & Steers Pref & Inc Oppos Act ETF | |||
| GBF | 105.17 | 0.06 | +0.06% |
| iShares Government/Credit Bond ETF | |||
| RTAI | 21.33 | -0.10 | -0.45% |
| Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF | |||
| QDEC | 31.11 | -0.21 | -0.67% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – Dec | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HFGO has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HFGO jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HFGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFGO | 100% | -1.04% | ||
| NVDA - HFGO | 82% Closely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| FLEX - HFGO | 76% Closely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| AMZN - HFGO | 74% Closely correlated | -4.43% | ||
| ARM - HFGO | 74% Closely correlated | -3.01% | ||
| MSFT - HFGO | 74% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QQQM has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QQQM jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QQQM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQM | 100% | -1.22% | ||
| KLAC - QQQM | 78% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| NVDA - QQQM | 78% Closely correlated | -2.81% | ||
| LRCX - QQQM | 78% Closely correlated | -2.86% | ||
| AMZN - QQQM | 77% Closely correlated | -4.43% | ||
| MSFT - QQQM | 76% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
More | ||||