Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFMSX vs TRQZX
HFMSX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts HFMSX vs TRQZX
HFMSX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFMSX vs. TRQZX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFMSX is a Buy and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. HFMSX (3.06B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than HFMSX: TRQZX (0.71) vs HFMSX (0.00). HFMSX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: HFMSX (17 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). HFMSX (1.17) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). HFMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. TRQZX (31.50). HFMSX (0) and TRQZX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.76 vs. HFMSX (-22.42). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -22.12 vs. HFMSX (-39.14).
| HFMSX | TRQZX | HFMSX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.61 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.075 | 0.488 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.06B | 21.1B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.42 | -5.76 | 389% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.84 | 0.92 | -1,285% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.14 | -22.12 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers