Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQAX vs TRIGX
HFQAX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQAX vs TRIGX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income A
Price$7.00
Change+$0.02 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$23.01
Change+$0.09 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.41B
HFQAX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQAX vs. TRIGX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQAX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.4B vs. HFQAX (6.62B). HFQAX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQAX (6.88) vs TRIGX (1.91). HFQAX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQAX (19 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFQAX (1.18) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFQAX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.57 vs. HFQAX (18.64). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 104.07 vs. HFQAX (67.71).
| HFQAX | TRIGX | HFQAX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.87 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.87 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.447 | 34.903 | 64% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.62B | 16.4B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.88 | 1.91 | 360% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.64 | 27.57 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.36 | 104.49 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.71 | 104.07 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.44 | 99.58 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers