Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQAX vs TRIGX
HFQAX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQAX vs TRIGX
HFQAX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQAX vs. TRIGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQAX is a Buy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. HFQAX (7.98B). HFQAX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQAX (5.74) vs TRIGX (2.27). HFQAX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQAX (20 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). HFQAX (1.12) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). HFQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). HFQAX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HFQAX (23.77) and TRIGX (22.89) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 93.71 vs. HFQAX (76.36).
| HFQAX | TRIGX | HFQAX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.81 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.81 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.799 | 15.055 | 118% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.98B | 16.8B | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.74 | 2.27 | 253% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.77 | 22.89 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.19 | 89.54 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.36 | 93.71 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.75 | 154.27 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement