Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQAX vs TRIGX
HFQAX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQAX vs TRIGX
HFQAX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQAX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQAX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. HFQAX (7.55B). HFQAX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQAX (6.00) vs TRIGX (2.29). HFQAX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQAX (20 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). HFQAX (1.12) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). HFQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). HFQAX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.40 vs. HFQAX (29.20). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.37 vs. HFQAX (74.82).
| HFQAX | TRIGX | HFQAX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.81 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.81 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.799 | 15.770 | 113% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.55B | 17B | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.00 | 2.29 | 263% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.20 | 32.40 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.37 | 85.84 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.82 | 99.37 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.81 | 160.35 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers