Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQCX vs TRIGX
HFQCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQCX vs TRIGX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income C
Price$6.75
Change+$0.02 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.96B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.98
Change+$0.07 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.02B
HFQCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQCX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. HFQCX (5.96B). HFQCX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQCX (6.70) vs TRIGX (2.11). HFQCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQCX (19 years) vs TRIGX (26 years). HFQCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFQCX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.03 vs. HFQCX (14.21). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 86.47 vs. HFQCX (56.57).
| HFQCX | TRIGX | HFQCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.87 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.87 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.392 | 23.072 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 15B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.70 | 2.11 | 318% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.21 | 20.03 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.16 | 51.62 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.57 | 86.47 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.09 | 69.23 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement