Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQCX vs TRIGX
HFQCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQCX vs TRIGX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income C
Price$6.82
Change+$0.03 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.23
Change+$0.18 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.13B
HFQCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQCX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15.1B vs. HFQCX (6.24B). HFQCX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQCX (6.70) vs TRIGX (2.11). HFQCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQCX (19 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFQCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFQCX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.25 vs. HFQCX (17.79). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.91 vs. HFQCX (66.48).
| HFQCX | TRIGX | HFQCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.87 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.87 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.935 | 23.896 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 15.1B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.70 | 2.11 | 318% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.79 | 25.25 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.75 | 65.23 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.48 | 99.91 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.91 | 71.98 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement