Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQCX vs TRIGX
HFQCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQCX vs TRIGX
HFQCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQCX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. HFQCX (7.55B). HFQCX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQCX (5.50) vs TRIGX (2.38). HFQCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQCX (20 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). HFQCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). HFQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). HFQCX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.01 vs. HFQCX (23.00). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 91.03 vs. HFQCX (62.60).
| HFQCX | TRIGX | HFQCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.81 | 217% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.81 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.313 | 12.405 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.55B | 16.9B | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.50 | 2.38 | 231% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.00 | 27.01 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.57 | 86.73 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.60 | 91.03 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.67 | 156.31 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers