Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQCX vs TRIGX
HFQCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQCX vs TRIGX
HFQCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQCX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17.3B vs. HFQCX (7.92B). HFQCX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQCX (5.33) vs TRIGX (2.29). HFQCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQCX (20 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). HFQCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). HFQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). HFQCX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.69 vs. HFQCX (24.72). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 102.01 vs. HFQCX (70.29).
| HFQCX | TRIGX | HFQCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.81 | 217% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 0.81 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.800 | 17.452 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.92B | 17.3B | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.33 | 2.29 | 233% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.72 | 27.69 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.00 | 96.38 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.29 | 102.01 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.11 | 155.73 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers