Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQDX vs TRIGX
HFQDX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQDX vs TRIGX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income D
Price$7.01
Change+$0.03 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.44B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.38
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.18B
HFQDX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQDX vs. TRIGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQDX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. HFQDX (6.44B). HFQDX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQDX (7.12) vs TRIGX (1.96). HFQDX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQDX (8 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFQDX (0.87) and TRIGX (0.87) have similar cost to investors . HFQDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFQDX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.97 vs. HFQDX (20.03). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 100.87 vs. HFQDX (70.33).
| HFQDX | TRIGX | HFQDX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.87 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.87 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.703 | 31.725 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.44B | 16.2B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.12 | 1.96 | 364% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.03 | 24.97 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.02 | 89.53 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.33 | 100.87 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers