Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQDX vs TRIGX
HFQDX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQDX vs TRIGX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income D
Price$6.91
Change-$0.04 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.7B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.85
Change-$0.14 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.3B
HFQDX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQDX vs. TRIGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQDX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. HFQDX (6.7B). HFQDX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQDX (7.16) vs TRIGX (1.90). HFQDX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQDX (8 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFQDX (0.87) and TRIGX (0.87) have similar cost to investors . HFQDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFQDX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.53 vs. HFQDX (20.50). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 87.15 vs. HFQDX (58.42).
| HFQDX | TRIGX | HFQDX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.87 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.87 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.907 | 35.315 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.7B | 16.3B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.16 | 1.90 | 377% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.50 | 34.53 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.02 | 78.01 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.42 | 87.15 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers