Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQDX vs TRIGX
HFQDX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQDX vs TRIGX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income D
Price$6.72
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.96B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.52
Change+$0.04 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.7B
HFQDX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQDX vs. TRIGX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQDX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 14.7B vs. HFQDX (5.96B). HFQDX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQDX (7.65) vs TRIGX (2.21). HFQDX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQDX (8 years) vs TRIGX (26 years). HFQDX (0.87) and TRIGX (0.87) have similar cost to investors . HFQDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFQDX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.89 vs. HFQDX (13.60). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 110.32 vs. HFQDX (78.48).
| HFQDX | TRIGX | HFQDX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.87 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.87 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.556 | 20.541 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 14.7B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.65 | 2.21 | 346% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.60 | 18.89 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.06 | 51.75 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.48 | 110.32 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 60.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers