Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQDX vs TRIGX
HFQDX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQDX vs TRIGX
HFQDX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQDX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQDX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17.3B vs. HFQDX (7.92B). HFQDX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQDX (6.09) vs TRIGX (2.29). HFQDX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQDX (9 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). HFQDX (0.85) and TRIGX (0.81) have similar cost to investors . HFQDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). HFQDX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.69 vs. HFQDX (25.89). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 102.01 vs. HFQDX (78.04).
| HFQDX | TRIGX | HFQDX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.81 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.81 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.606 | 17.452 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.92B | 17.3B | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.09 | 2.29 | 266% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.89 | 27.69 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.65 | 96.38 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.04 | 102.01 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 155.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers