Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQDX vs TRIGX
HFQDX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQDX vs TRIGX
HFQDX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQDX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQDX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. HFQDX (7.55B). HFQDX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQDX (6.29) vs TRIGX (2.38). HFQDX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQDX (9 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). HFQDX (0.85) and TRIGX (0.81) have similar cost to investors . HFQDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). HFQDX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.36 vs. HFQDX (24.26). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 92.54 vs. HFQDX (69.76).
| HFQDX | TRIGX | HFQDX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.81 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.81 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.748 | 12.868 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.55B | 17B | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.29 | 2.38 | 265% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.26 | 28.36 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.93 | 83.01 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.76 | 92.54 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 156.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement