Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQDX vs TRIGX
HFQDX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQDX vs TRIGX
HFQDX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQDX vs. TRIGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQDX is a Buy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. HFQDX (7.98B). HFQDX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQDX (6.01) vs TRIGX (2.27). HFQDX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQDX (9 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). HFQDX (0.85) and TRIGX (0.81) have similar cost to investors . HFQDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). HFQDX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HFQDX (24.05) and TRIGX (22.89) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 93.71 vs. HFQDX (78.75).
| HFQDX | TRIGX | HFQDX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.81 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.81 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.034 | 15.055 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.98B | 16.8B | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.01 | 2.27 | 265% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.05 | 22.89 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.41 | 89.54 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.75 | 93.71 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 154.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement