Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQIX vs TRIGX
HFQIX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQIX vs TRIGX
HFQIX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQIX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQIX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. HFQIX (7.55B). HFQIX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQIX (6.27) vs TRIGX (2.38). HFQIX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQIX (17 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). TRIGX (0.81) and HFQIX (0.79) have similar cost to investors . HFQIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). HFQIX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.36 vs. HFQIX (24.09). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 92.54 vs. HFQIX (70.12).
| HFQIX | TRIGX | HFQIX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.81 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.81 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.646 | 12.868 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.55B | 17B | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.27 | 2.38 | 264% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.09 | 28.36 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.07 | 83.01 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.12 | 92.54 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.75 | 156.57 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers