Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQRX vs LIDCX
HFQRX vs LIDCX Comparison
Open Charts HFQRX vs LIDCX
HFQRX vs LIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQRX vs. LIDCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQRX is a Buy and LIDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 7.98B vs. LIDCX (548M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than LIDCX: HFQRX (6.08) vs LIDCX (1.62). HFQRX was incepted earlier than LIDCX: HFQRX (11 years) vs LIDCX (18 years). LIDCX (1.73) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.69). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. LIDCX (66.00). LIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: LIDCX (1500) vs HFQRX (1000000). LIDCX (24.57) and HFQRX (24.33) have marching annual gain over last year. HFQRX return over 5 years is better than : 80.34 vs. LIDCX (63.86).
| HFQRX | LIDCX | HFQRX / LIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.73 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.73 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.094 | 15.521 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.98B | 548M | 1,456% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.08 | 1.62 | 375% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.33 | 24.57 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.20 | 76.34 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.34 | 63.86 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 136.93 | 109.46 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement