Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQSX vs TRIGX
HFQSX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQSX vs TRIGX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income S
Price$6.90
Change-$0.02 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.92
Change-$0.21 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.55B
HFQSX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQSX vs. TRIGX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQSX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.5B vs. HFQSX (6.62B). HFQSX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQSX (6.91) vs TRIGX (1.91). HFQSX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQSX (8 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFQSX (1.21) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFQSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFQSX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.11 vs. HFQSX (15.93). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 106.76 vs. HFQSX (65.98).
| HFQSX | TRIGX | HFQSX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.87 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.87 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.049 | 36.139 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.62B | 16.5B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.91 | 1.91 | 361% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.93 | 28.11 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.23 | 106.36 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.98 | 106.76 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement