Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQSX vs TRIGX
HFQSX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQSX vs TRIGX
HFQSX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQSX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQSX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. HFQSX (7.55B). HFQSX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQSX (5.98) vs TRIGX (2.29). HFQSX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQSX (9 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). HFQSX (1.20) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). HFQSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). HFQSX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.40 vs. HFQSX (28.96). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.37 vs. HFQSX (71.66).
| HFQSX | TRIGX | HFQSX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.81 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.81 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.682 | 15.770 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.55B | 17B | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.98 | 2.29 | 262% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.96 | 32.40 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.40 | 85.84 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.66 | 99.37 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 160.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers