Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQSX vs TRIGX
HFQSX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQSX vs TRIGX
HFQSX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQSX vs. TRIGX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQSX is a Buy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. HFQSX (7.98B). HFQSX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQSX (5.72) vs TRIGX (2.27). HFQSX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQSX (9 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). HFQSX (1.20) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). HFQSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). HFQSX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HFQSX (23.66) and TRIGX (22.89) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 93.71 vs. HFQSX (73.18).
| HFQSX | TRIGX | HFQSX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.81 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.81 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.682 | 15.055 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.98B | 16.8B | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.72 | 2.27 | 252% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.66 | 22.89 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.18 | 89.54 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.18 | 93.71 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 154.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement