Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQTX vs TRIGX
HFQTX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQTX vs TRIGX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income T
Price$6.95
Change+$0.09 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.7B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.92
Change+$0.37 (+1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.99B
HFQTX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQTX vs. TRIGX commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQTX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. HFQTX (6.7B). HFQTX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQTX (7.07) vs TRIGX (1.90). HFQTX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQTX (8 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFQTX (0.95) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFQTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFQTX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.26 vs. HFQTX (21.29). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 83.56 vs. HFQTX (58.85).
| HFQTX | TRIGX | HFQTX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.87 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.87 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.540 | 32.725 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.7B | 16B | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.07 | 1.90 | 372% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.29 | 32.26 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.13 | 73.61 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.85 | 83.56 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 100.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement