Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQTX vs TRIGX
HFQTX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQTX vs TRIGX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income T
Price$6.73
Change-$0.02 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.96B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.48
Change-$0.16 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.82B
HFQTX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQTX vs. TRIGX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQTX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. HFQTX (5.96B). HFQTX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQTX (7.58) vs TRIGX (2.21). HFQTX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQTX (8 years) vs TRIGX (26 years). HFQTX (0.95) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFQTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFQTX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.61 vs. HFQTX (13.16). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 111.96 vs. HFQTX (78.26).
| HFQTX | TRIGX | HFQTX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.87 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.87 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.705 | 21.483 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 14.8B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.58 | 2.21 | 343% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.16 | 18.61 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.41 | 55.59 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.26 | 111.96 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 61.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers