Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQTX vs TRIGX
HFQTX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQTX vs TRIGX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income T
Price$6.95
Change+$0.05 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.20
Change+$0.18 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.13B
HFQTX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQTX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQTX is a Buy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15.1B vs. HFQTX (6.24B). HFQTX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQTX (7.29) vs TRIGX (2.11). HFQTX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQTX (8 years) vs TRIGX (26 years). HFQTX (0.95) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFQTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFQTX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.37 vs. HFQTX (18.33). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 97.77 vs. HFQTX (73.84).
| HFQTX | TRIGX | HFQTX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.87 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.87 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.422 | 23.720 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 15.1B | 41% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.29 | 2.11 | 346% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.33 | 22.37 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.01 | 66.20 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.84 | 97.77 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers