Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQTX vs TRIGX
HFQTX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQTX vs TRIGX
HFQTX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQTX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQTX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. HFQTX (7.55B). HFQTX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQTX (6.18) vs TRIGX (2.29). HFQTX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQTX (9 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). HFQTX (0.94) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). HFQTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). HFQTX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.40 vs. HFQTX (29.39). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.37 vs. HFQTX (76.35).
| HFQTX | TRIGX | HFQTX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.81 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.81 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.818 | 15.770 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.55B | 17B | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.18 | 2.29 | 271% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.39 | 32.40 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.20 | 85.84 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.35 | 99.37 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 160.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement