Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFQTX vs TRIGX
HFQTX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFQTX vs TRIGX
HFQTX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFQTX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFQTX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. HFQTX (7.57B). HFQTX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFQTX (6.17) vs TRIGX (2.38). HFQTX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFQTX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFQTX (0.94) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). HFQTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 175.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). HFQTX (2500) and TRIGX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.25 vs. HFQTX (26.55). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 81.15 vs. HFQTX (64.08).
| HFQTX | TRIGX | HFQTX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.81 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.81 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.338 | 10.471 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.57B | 17B | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.17 | 2.38 | 259% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.55 | 29.25 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.33 | 87.76 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.08 | 81.15 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 146.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement