Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFSFX vs TRIGX
HFSFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFSFX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Cntrrn Val F
Price$16.52
Change-$0.11 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.81M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.85
Change-$0.14 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.3B
HFSFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. HFSFX (153M). TRIGX pays higher dividends than HFSFX: TRIGX (1.90) vs HFSFX (1.40). HFSFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFSFX (2 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFSFX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFSFX: TRIGX (2500) vs HFSFX (1000000). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.53 vs. HFSFX (31.26).
| HFSFX | TRIGX | HFSFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.87 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 35.203 | 35.315 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153M | 16.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 1.90 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.26 | 34.53 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 78.01 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 87.15 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement