Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFSFX vs TRIGX
HFSFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFSFX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Cntrrn Val F
Price$15.67
Change+$0.06 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets125.05M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.61
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.79B
HFSFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. HFSFX (125M). TRIGX pays higher dividends than HFSFX: TRIGX (2.04) vs HFSFX (1.50). HFSFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFSFX (2 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFSFX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFSFX: TRIGX (2500) vs HFSFX (1000000). HFSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.34 vs. TRIGX (24.18).
| HFSFX | TRIGX | HFSFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.87 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.911 | 27.251 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 125M | 15.8B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 2.04 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.34 | 24.18 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 77.28 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 100.86 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 75.69 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement