Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFSFX vs TRIGX
HFSFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFSFX vs TRIGX
HFSFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. HFSFX (229M). HFSFX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFSFX (3.42) vs TRIGX (2.38). HFSFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFSFX (3 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). HFSFX (0.84) and TRIGX (0.81) have similar cost to investors . HFSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFSFX: TRIGX (2500) vs HFSFX (1000000). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.85 vs. HFSFX (22.91).
| HFSFX | TRIGX | HFSFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.81 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.81 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.832 | 11.775 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 16.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.42 | 2.38 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.91 | 31.85 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 88.48 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 89.13 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 167.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers