Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYFX vs TRIGX
HFYFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYFX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val F
Price$13.43
Change-$0.08 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.66B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.85
Change-$0.14 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.3B
HFYFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYFX vs. TRIGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYFX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. HFYFX (2.66B). HFYFX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYFX (2.43) vs TRIGX (1.90). HFYFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYFX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than HFYFX (0.76). HFYFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFYFX: TRIGX (2500) vs HFYFX (1000000). HFYFX (36.17) and TRIGX (34.53) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 87.15 vs. HFYFX (79.35).
| HFYFX | TRIGX | HFYFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.87 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.87 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.926 | 35.315 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.66B | 16.3B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.43 | 1.90 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.17 | 34.53 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.33 | 78.01 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.35 | 87.15 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 102.23 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers