Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYFX vs TRIGX
HFYFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYFX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val F
Price$12.59
Change+$0.09 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.44B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.72
Change+$0.13 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.81B
HFYFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYFX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYFX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. HFYFX (2.44B). HFYFX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYFX (2.73) vs TRIGX (2.05). HFYFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYFX (8 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than HFYFX (0.76). HFYFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFYFX: TRIGX (2500) vs HFYFX (1000000). HFYFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.28 vs. TRIGX (29.90). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 95.67 vs. HFYFX (75.87).
| HFYFX | TRIGX | HFYFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.87 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.87 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.143 | 27.075 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.44B | 15.8B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.73 | 2.05 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.28 | 29.90 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.03 | 70.33 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.87 | 95.67 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 75.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement