Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYFX vs TRIGX
HFYFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYFX vs TRIGX
HFYFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYFX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYFX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. HFYFX (3.59B). HFYFX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYFX (2.78) vs TRIGX (2.38). HFYFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYFX (9 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). TRIGX (0.81) is less costly to investors than HFYFX (0.75). HFYFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFYFX: TRIGX (2500) vs HFYFX (1000000). HFYFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.12 vs. TRIGX (28.11). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 82.50 vs. HFYFX (73.27).
| HFYFX | TRIGX | HFYFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.81 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.81 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.576 | 11.228 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.59B | 16.8B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.78 | 2.38 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.12 | 28.11 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.29 | 85.13 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.27 | 82.50 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 162.37 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement