Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYSX vs TRIGX
HFYSX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYSX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R4
Price$12.09
Change-$0.15 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.35B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.92
Change-$0.28 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.28B
HFYSX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYSX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYSX is a Buy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15.3B vs. HFYSX (2.35B). HFYSX (2.22) and TRIGX (2.11) have matching dividends . HFYSX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYSX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). HFYSX (1.17) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). HFYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). HFYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYSX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.42 vs. HFYSX (23.11). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.46 vs. HFYSX (76.18).
| HFYSX | TRIGX | HFYSX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.87 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.87 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.195 | 24.779 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.35B | 15.3B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.22 | 2.11 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.11 | 25.42 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.51 | 68.60 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.18 | 99.46 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement