Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYSX vs TRIGX
HFYSX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYSX vs TRIGX
HFYSX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYSX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYSX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. HFYSX (3.62B). HFYSX (2.45) and TRIGX (2.38) have matching dividends . HFYSX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYSX (10 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). HFYSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). HFYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). HFYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYSX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). HFYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.61 vs. TRIGX (28.36). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 92.54 vs. HFYSX (74.28).
| HFYSX | TRIGX | HFYSX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.81 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.81 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.389 | 12.868 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.62B | 17B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 2.38 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.61 | 28.36 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.12 | 83.01 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.28 | 92.54 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 156.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers