Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYSX vs TRIGX
HFYSX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYSX vs TRIGX
HFYSX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYSX vs. TRIGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYSX is a Buy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.8B vs. HFYSX (3.87B). HFYSX (2.35) and TRIGX (2.27) have matching dividends . HFYSX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYSX (10 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). HFYSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). HFYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). HFYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYSX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). HFYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.31 vs. TRIGX (22.89). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 93.71 vs. HFYSX (81.63).
| HFYSX | TRIGX | HFYSX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.81 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.81 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.643 | 15.055 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.87B | 16.8B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 2.27 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.31 | 22.89 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.26 | 89.54 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.63 | 93.71 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 154.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement