Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYSX vs TRIGX
HFYSX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYSX vs TRIGX
HFYSX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYSX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYSX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. HFYSX (3.65B). HFYSX (2.46) and TRIGX (2.38) have matching dividends . HFYSX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYSX (10 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). HFYSX (1.16) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). HFYSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). HFYSX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: HFYSX (0) vs TRIGX (2500). HFYSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.03 vs. TRIGX (31.85). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 89.13 vs. HFYSX (76.62).
| HFYSX | TRIGX | HFYSX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.81 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.81 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.850 | 11.775 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.65B | 16.9B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 2.38 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.03 | 31.85 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.69 | 88.48 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.62 | 89.13 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 167.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement