Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYYX vs TRIGX
HFYYX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYYX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val Y
Price$12.11
Change-$0.15 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.32B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.92
Change-$0.28 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.05B
HFYYX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYYX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYYX is a Buy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. HFYYX (2.32B). HFYYX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYYX (2.50) vs TRIGX (2.11). HFYYX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYYX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) and HFYYX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . HFYYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFYYX: TRIGX (2500) vs HFYYX (250000). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.76 vs. HFYYX (22.07). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 96.83 vs. HFYYX (76.43).
| HFYYX | TRIGX | HFYYX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.858 | 23.131 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.32B | 15B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.50 | 2.11 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.07 | 23.76 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.00 | 66.38 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.43 | 96.83 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 68.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers