Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYYX vs TRIGX
HFYYX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYYX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val Y
Price$12.93
Change+$0.06 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.51B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.38
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.14B
HFYYX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYYX vs. TRIGX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYYX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.1B vs. HFYYX (2.51B). HFYYX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYYX (2.51) vs TRIGX (1.96). HFYYX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYYX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) and HFYYX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . HFYYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFYYX: TRIGX (2500) vs HFYYX (250000). HFYYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.68 vs. TRIGX (24.64). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 100.33 vs. HFYYX (82.94).
| HFYYX | TRIGX | HFYYX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.585 | 31.371 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.51B | 16.1B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.51 | 1.96 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.68 | 24.64 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.70 | 89.02 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.94 | 100.33 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement