Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYYX vs TRIGX
HFYYX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYYX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val Y
Price$11.88
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.28B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.56
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.77B
HFYYX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYYX vs. TRIGX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYYX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. HFYYX (2.28B). HFYYX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYYX (2.64) vs TRIGX (2.21). HFYYX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYYX (9 years) vs TRIGX (26 years). TRIGX (0.87) and HFYYX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . HFYYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFYYX: TRIGX (2500) vs HFYYX (250000). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.97 vs. HFYYX (17.79). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 111.14 vs. HFYYX (86.40).
| HFYYX | TRIGX | HFYYX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.544 | 21.012 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.28B | 14.8B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 2.21 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.79 | 19.97 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.84 | 52.76 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.40 | 111.14 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers