Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYYX vs TRIGX
HFYYX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYYX vs TRIGX
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val Y
Price$12.35
Change+$0.04 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.39B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$21.54
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.75B
HFYYX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYYX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYYX is a Buy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15.8B vs. HFYYX (2.39B). HFYYX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYYX (2.64) vs TRIGX (2.04). HFYYX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYYX (9 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) and HFYYX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . HFYYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFYYX: TRIGX (2500) vs HFYYX (250000). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.12 vs. HFYYX (23.58). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.95 vs. HFYYX (80.94).
| HFYYX | TRIGX | HFYYX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.87 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.682 | 26.780 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.39B | 15.8B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 2.04 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.58 | 25.12 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.44 | 72.07 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.94 | 99.95 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.90 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement