Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HFYYX vs TRIGX
HFYYX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts HFYYX vs TRIGX
HFYYX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HFYYX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HFYYX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17B vs. HFYYX (3.69B). HFYYX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: HFYYX (2.65) vs TRIGX (2.29). HFYYX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: HFYYX (10 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). HFYYX (0.85) and TRIGX (0.81) have similar cost to investors . HFYYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFYYX: TRIGX (2500) vs HFYYX (250000). HFYYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.09 vs. TRIGX (32.40). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 99.37 vs. HFYYX (81.43).
| HFYYX | TRIGX | HFYYX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.81 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.81 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.239 | 15.770 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 2500 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 17B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 2.29 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.09 | 32.40 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.70 | 85.84 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.43 | 99.37 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 160.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement