HGBL
Price
$1.75
Change
+$0.01 (+0.57%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
85 days until earnings call
NHMAF
Price
$4.31
Change
+$0.13 (+3.11%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

HGBL vs NHMAF

Header iconHGBL vs NHMAF Comparison
Open Charts HGBL vs NHMAFBanner chart's image
Heritage Global
Price$1.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.57%)
Volume$2.1K
CapitalizationN/A
Nihon M and A Center
Price$4.31
Change+$0.13 (+3.11%)
Volume$228
CapitalizationN/A
HGBL vs NHMAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
HGBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NHMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HGBL vs. NHMAF commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGBL is a Hold and NHMAF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (HGBL: $1.75 vs. NHMAF: $4.31)
Brand notoriety: HGBL and NHMAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HGBL: 237% vs. NHMAF: 188%
Market capitalization -- HGBL: $97.05M vs. NHMAF: $1.87B
HGBL [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $97.05M. NHMAF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HGBL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNHMAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • HGBL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NHMAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HGBL is a better buy in the long-term than NHMAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HGBL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NHMAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HGBL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NHMAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HGBL is a better buy in the short-term than NHMAF.

Price Growth

HGBL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +1.16% price change this week, while NHMAF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +3.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

HGBL is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.56% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAF($1.87B) has a higher market cap than HGBL($97.1M). NHMAF has higher P/E ratio than HGBL: NHMAF (25.00) vs HGBL (8.03). NHMAF YTD gains are higher at: -15.007 vs. HGBL (-37.050). NHMAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.1B vs. HGBL (14.8M). NHMAF has more cash in the bank: 44B vs. HGBL (12.3M). HGBL has less debt than NHMAF: HGBL (9.88M) vs NHMAF (500M). NHMAF has higher revenues than HGBL: NHMAF (36B) vs HGBL (60.5M).
HGBLNHMAFHGBL / NHMAF
Capitalization97.1M1.87B5%
EBITDA14.8M12.1B0%
Gain YTD-37.050-15.007247%
P/E Ratio8.0325.0032%
Revenue60.5M36B0%
Total Cash12.3M44B0%
Total Debt9.88M500M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HGBL vs NHMAF: Fundamental Ratings
HGBL
NHMAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67100
SMR RATING
1..100
5230
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5959
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4490
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HGBL's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as NHMAF (99). This means that HGBL’s stock grew similarly to NHMAF’s over the last 12 months.

HGBL's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NHMAF (100). This means that HGBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NHMAF’s over the last 12 months.

NHMAF's SMR Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as HGBL (52). This means that NHMAF’s stock grew similarly to HGBL’s over the last 12 months.

NHMAF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as HGBL (59). This means that NHMAF’s stock grew similarly to HGBL’s over the last 12 months.

HGBL's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NHMAF (90). This means that HGBL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NHMAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HGBLNHMAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HGBL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NHMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNSWF3110.0035.90
+1.17%
Constellation Software, Inc.
NSANY5.68-0.05
-0.87%
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
GPHOF0.46-0.02
-3.19%
Graphite One Inc.
TIIAY2.45-0.12
-4.67%
Telecom Italia S.p.A.
GMBL0.23-0.04
-13.22%
Esports Entertainment Group, Inc.

HGBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HGBL and NHMAF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HGBL and NHMAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HGBL
1D Price
Change %
HGBL100%
+0.57%
NHMAF - HGBL
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MSCI - HGBL
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
MKTX - HGBL
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
RJF - HGBL
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.78%
FDS - HGBL
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
More

NHMAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NHMAF and HGBL have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NHMAF and HGBL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NHMAF
1D Price
Change %
NHMAF100%
N/A
HGBL - NHMAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
OTCM - NHMAF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
NRSCF - NHMAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLNH - NHMAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+9.00%
OSCUF - NHMAF
1%
Poorly correlated
-5.97%
More