GS
Price
$1062.75
Change
+$27.11 (+2.62%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
313.52B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HGBL
Price
$1.27
Change
-$0.03 (-2.31%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
44.11M
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GS vs HGBL

Header iconGS vs HGBL Comparison
Open Charts GS vs HGBLBanner chart's image
GS vs HGBL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GS vs. HGBL commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GS is a Hold and HGBL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2026
Stock price -- (GS: $1062.75 vs. HGBL: $1.27)
Brand notoriety: GS: Notable vs. HGBL: Not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GS: 105% vs. HGBL: 98%
Market capitalization -- GS: $313.52B vs. HGBL: $44.11M
GS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $313.52B. HGBL’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $44.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $13.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileHGBL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • HGBL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the long-term than HGBL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HGBL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HGBL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the short-term than HGBL.

Price Growth

GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +2.32% price change this week, while HGBL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

GS is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.

HGBL is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+1.59% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($314B) has a higher market cap than HGBL($44.1M). GS has higher P/E ratio than HGBL: GS (19.41) vs HGBL (14.11). GS YTD gains are higher at: 22.076 vs. HGBL (2.419). HGBL has less debt than GS: HGBL (5.54M) vs GS (435B). GS has higher revenues than HGBL: GS (60.4B) vs HGBL (50.2M).
GSHGBLGS / HGBL
Capitalization314B44.1M712,018%
EBITDAN/A5.95M-
Gain YTD22.0762.419912%
P/E Ratio19.4114.11138%
Revenue60.4B50.2M120,319%
Total CashN/A11.6M-
Total Debt435B5.54M7,856,240%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GS vs HGBL: Fundamental Ratings
GS
HGBL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3616
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7100
SMR RATING
1..100
786
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2568
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HGBL's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as GS (83) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that HGBL’s stock grew similarly to GS’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for HGBL (100) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew significantly faster than HGBL’s over the last 12 months.

GS's SMR Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for HGBL (86) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew significantly faster than HGBL’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGBL (57) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HGBL’s over the last 12 months.

GS's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGBL (68) in the null industry. This means that GS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HGBL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GSHGBL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HGBL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTLE5.980.97
+19.36%
PTL Ltd
CBL49.700.58
+1.17%
CBL & Associates Properties
WMT121.040.54
+0.45%
Walmart
SLAB219.510.61
+0.28%
Silicon Laboratories
BKTI83.56-1.22
-1.44%
BK Technologies Corp

HGBL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HGBL and MRX have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HGBL and MRX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HGBL
1D Price
Change %
HGBL100%
-2.31%
MRX - HGBL
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.19%
EVR - HGBL
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
MSCI - HGBL
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
ABTC - HGBL
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.87%
GS - HGBL
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.62%
More