Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGHCX vs JNGLX
HGHCX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGHCX vs. JNGLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGHCX is a Hold and JNGLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.95B vs. HGHCX (834M). JNGLX pays higher dividends than HGHCX: JNGLX (0.31) vs HGHCX (0.00). HGHCX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: HGHCX (26 years) vs JNGLX (27 years). HGHCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than JNGLX (0.80). HGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). HGHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: HGHCX (2000) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.59 vs. HGHCX (1.05). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 17.10 vs. HGHCX (-23.20).
| HGHCX | JNGLX | HGHCX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.80 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.80 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.258 | 20.445 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 834M | 4.95B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.31 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.05 | 10.59 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.93 | 26.67 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.20 | 17.10 | -136% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.88 | 51.40 | -48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement