Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGHCX vs JNGLX
HGHCX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGHCX vs. JNGLX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGHCX is a Hold and JNGLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.4B vs. HGHCX (743M). JNGLX pays higher dividends than HGHCX: JNGLX (0.36) vs HGHCX (0.00). HGHCX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: HGHCX (25 years) vs JNGLX (27 years). HGHCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than JNGLX (0.80). HGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). HGHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: HGHCX (2000) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.54 vs. HGHCX (-20.81). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.85 vs. HGHCX (-32.65).
| HGHCX | JNGLX | HGHCX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.80 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.80 | 259% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.804 | -2.401 | 325% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 743M | 4.4B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.81 | -13.54 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.31 | 4.46 | -298% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.65 | 1.85 | -1,766% |
| Returns for 10 years | -40.31 | 8.81 | -457% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement