Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGHCX vs SHSAX
HGHCX vs SHSAX Comparison
Open Charts HGHCX vs SHSAX
HGHCX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGHCX vs. SHSAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGHCX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.17B vs. HGHCX (796M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than HGHCX: SHSAX (0.26) vs HGHCX (0.00). HGHCX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: HGHCX (26 years) vs SHSAX (27 years). HGHCX (2.12) is less costly to investors than SHSAX (1.09). HGHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. SHSAX (43.00). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGHCX: SHSAX (1000) vs HGHCX (2000). HGHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.57 vs. SHSAX (4.10). SHSAX return over 5 years is better than : -17.90 vs. HGHCX (-19.04).
| HGHCX | SHSAX | HGHCX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.09 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 1.09 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.675 | -2.642 | -253% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 796M | 6.17B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.26 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.57 | 4.10 | 428% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.31 | -2.23 | -506% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.04 | -17.90 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.93 | 34.80 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers