Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGICX vs RWMFX
HGICX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts HGICX vs RWMFX
HGICX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGICX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGICX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. HGICX (11.5B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than HGICX: RWMFX (1.40) vs HGICX (0.00). HGICX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: HGICX (28 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). HGICX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). HGICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGICX: RWMFX (250) vs HGICX (2000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.15 vs. HGICX (6.86). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.55 vs. HGICX (22.19).
| HGICX | RWMFX | HGICX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.31 | 471% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 0.31 | 471% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.064 | 1.616 | 437% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 218B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | 8.15 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.02 | 30.58 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.19 | 27.55 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.50 | 82.86 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement