Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGIFX vs RWMFX
HGIFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts HGIFX vs RWMFX
HGIFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGIFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGIFX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. HGIFX (11.6B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than HGIFX: RWMFX (1.40) vs HGIFX (0.54). HGIFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: HGIFX (9 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). HGIFX (0.36) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). HGIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGIFX: RWMFX (250) vs HGIFX (1000000). HGIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.79 vs. RWMFX (8.15). HGIFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.66 vs. RWMFX (27.55).
| HGIFX | RWMFX | HGIFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.31 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.31 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.626 | 1.616 | 472% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.6B | 218B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.40 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.79 | 8.15 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.35 | 30.58 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.66 | 27.55 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers