Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
HGIFX vs RWMFX
HGIFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts HGIFX vs RWMFX
HGIFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
HGIFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGIFX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. HGIFX (11.3B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than HGIFX: RWMFX (1.41) vs HGIFX (0.53). HGIFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: HGIFX (10 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). HGIFX (0.36) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). HGIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGIFX: RWMFX (250) vs HGIFX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. HGIFX (0.18). HGIFX (27.73) and RWMFX (27.39) have equivalent 5 years return.
| HGIFX | RWMFX | HGIFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.31 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.31 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.660 | 4.508 | 192% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.3B | 218B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.41 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.18 | 2.09 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.57 | 30.24 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.73 | 27.39 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers